I never ceased to be amazed at the fact that many Realtors are judging the value of a luxury home on the basis of its square footage. For a bank appraiser or a home builder to think that way, I can understand, it can indeed be part of the valuation methodology, but for Realtors?
In the high end, not two homes are the same, even when they are….or they appear to be. Take two identical penthouses in New York, both brand new; same top floor, same square footage, same layout, and same amenities. I guarantee that one is worth more than the other, often a lot more. Perhaps one has a better sun exposure, or a nicer view, or sits next to another beautiful residential building while the other one has a service station for a neighbor, or one is further away from a noisy school yard, etc. Are these two properties identical? Of course not.
I remember looking at fancy real estate while in the South of France, a few years back. One town got my interest, and yours too, probably, given the opportunity: Cannes, the site of the international film festival, stretching beautifully along the crystal blue Mediterranean sea. Right in the middle of “La Croisette”, Heaven’s local version of a boardwalk, there is a nice white building where, every so often, condos are “offered” for sale. I saw one I liked –of course I am easy to please. Third floor, bay windows and a balcony open to the ocean, the harbor full of the most amazing yachts, and a full view of the street action underneath, at the level of Cartier, Hermes, Prada…You see what I mean. That little pad was available for the taking at over $10,000 per square foot. No, I did not buy it. In the back of the building, another condo was unofficially on the market. Bigger and on a higher floor, but the asking price was not even half that of the first. The view was nice but who wants to overlook a pool, a garden and a bunch of rooftops when the alternative –for only twice as much- is a panoramic piece of the Mediterranean?
Square footage is largely irrelevant in the high end. Buyers buy benefits, real or perceived. Bigger is not necessarily better. Depends what you really want, or what you really need. It’s OK to want to live in a 20,000 square foot home. It might even be pleasurable. But please understand that if & when you decide to sell it, it may fetch only what a nearby property of similar quality but smaller size will obtain in the open market. Size usually needs to serve a purpose to be worth the money it costs to build. For example, you can get your money back and sometimes make a little more if you put a home theater in your home, or a library, or a wine cellar, or an indoor pool, or a racket-ball court and perhaps even a ballroom, why not? However, if you have a huge house just to have huge rooms, square footage could be more a handicap than an added value.
Having said that, if you want a huge home because you like the feel, the space and have no concern about an eventual resale, don’t listen to me. What do I know, for the time being I live in a condo! A nice one though.

