Archive for the ‘property values in San Carlos’ Category

Buyer Mentality vs. Lowball Reality

1 Comment

Lowball offers rarely, if ever, get accepted.

There, I said it.

Almost everything you read in the news these days about the housing market points to it being a Buyer’s Market.  That is true to some extent, but not 100% of the time. There are neighborhoods out there that are exceptions to the rule, and often still get multiple offers (i.e. Palo Alto, Los Altos, parts of San Carlos & Redwood City).

But back to the notion of “lowball offers.” In my opinion, the success of a lowball offer is a bit of a myth.

From a SELLERS perspective

The current buyer mentality as a whole is fueled by what buyers read in the news, and the economic malaise in general. That mentality will not, I must repeat, will not change anytime soon.  So unless you’re selling a home in one of those rare “hot” neighborhoods, here’s the expectation you should have — buyers are going to come in and lowball you. Negotiating the best possible price is what I strive to do for my sellers every time (and I would think that nearly all listing agents have this fiduciary objective) — there’s no way I’d advise a seller to accept a lowball offer on the first round.  When buyers come into my listings and ask, “How low will they go?” my pat answer is, “Well, put something in writing and you’re sure to find out.”  Any good listing agent will not show their hand to how low their seller would go.

From a BUYER perspective

Now I’ll put my Buyer’s Agent hat on.

For a home that’s been on the market a LONG time (relatively speaking, of course), sure, the odds are that the home will sell for less than its asking price. How MUCH less really depends on the seller — since every seller’s situation is unique, I really don’t know “how low” they will go until I do a little further investigation with the sellers’ agent.  Even then, the sellers’ agent will rarely tell you exactly how low the sellers will go — that breaches his fiduciary duty to the sellers.  That agent’s duty is to get the home sold for the best possible price relative to all the other market conditions.

So, if you come in with a lowball offer (again, lowball being a relative term), the expectation you should ALWAYS have is that you’re going to get a counter-offer from the sellers.  Yes, sellers are “motivated,” but being motivated does NOT mean “desperate.”

Step 1: Make a lowball offer.   Step 2: Receive a counter offer from the seller.  It’s gonna happen, like it or not.

Look, here’s the reality: yes, buyers are generally in the driver’s seat these days, but, many sellers would rather wait it out, or take their home off the market before they accept a lowball offer.  Making a lowball offer, while it is a start to putting something in writing on the table, rarely meets with success.  Save your time and your efforts, and instead of getting your hopes up for getting “the deal of the century,” make a reasonable offer instead — the more fair/close-to-asking your offer price is, the less likely you are to get a counter-offer from the sellers.


San Carlos’ Thorny Artificial Turf Issue

0 Comments

There’s a polarizing issue in the Highlands Park neighborhood of San Carlos these days, and it has to do with the potential to install artificial turf at the neighboring park.

How does this affect homes and home values? Since everything under the sun has to be disclosed when selling a house, here’s a simplified after-effect of installing artificial turf in a public park:

  1. Turf on athletic fields at public park  = Year round sports instead of seasonal
  2. Year round sports = Constant soccer, baseball, basketball games going on year round
  3. Constant games going on = Lots of cars parking on streets in front of homes
  4. Lots of cars parking on streets = Impact on ‘peace and quiet’ of neighborhood
  5. No peace and quiet = Perceived value of homes goes down
  6. Home values going down = Local residents do not want artificial turf

In the SJ Merc the other day was this article.  Here are some of the salient highlights from the article:

With San Carlos poised to start installing artificial turf at Highlands Park today, a group of residents who sued to block the project say the city is taking a big risk by breaking ground before a judge has ruled on the lawsuit.

They say the city shouldn’t start the project until a San Mateo County Superior Court judge weighs in on the lawsuit filed by Save San Carlos Parks, which argues the city didn’t properly review the new field’s potential environmental effects on health and traffic. Judge Marie Weiner is expected to rule by Aug. 25.

If Weiner decides the city must do further environmental work, it will have to pause construction and leave the park unusable and in a state of disrepair indefinitely, said Greg Harris, a member of the residents’ group. He said it’s worth waiting another two weeks for a ruling on a project that was conceived a decade ago.

City officials counter that they could take a financial hit if they don’t proceed with installing turf, which has been done without controversy in other Peninsula cities but has been one of the hottest topics in San Carlos for years.

Officials say the $1.7 million bid from Interstate Grading and Paving, which the city council accepted in February, is an exceptionally low price due to a job-hungry construction industry and an Italian turf manufacturer who is offering a discount to break into the American market.

Harris dismissed the cost argument, saying it’s possible the city could get the same bid or an even lower one if it advertises the project again after the judge’s decision.

The city plans to fence off the 3.5-acre lower athletic field at Highlands Park today for site preparation work. Excavation and grading work will start next week, said Public Works Director Robert Weil. If all goes well, the project will be finished by the end of the year.

Weil acknowledged that the park will be unusable if the city has to pause construction to do further environmental studies, which could take months, but he said officials will ensure the park doesn’t pose a hazard.

Proponents say the artificial surface will lower maintenance costs and allow the field to be used year-round. The grass fields, on the other hand, must periodically be closed so they can recover from heavy use.

But opponents have said the extra use allowed by the new surface will bring more traffic to the neighborhood. They also had objected to the use of rubber pellets between the grass blades, though the city has since decided to use an organic infill instead to address those concerns.

“We’re not going to delay a project that will benefit thousands of people because a small neighborhood group has filed a lawsuit against us,” Klein said.


Vote to save the San Carlos schools and your property values!

0 Comments

posted by Ed Gory of the Intero San Carlos office

Those that live in the San Carlos school district I’m sure have heard that the schools need to make over $2 million in budget cuts by June of this year, even though they are the lowest funded district in the San Mateo County. Measure S which was on the ballot in November unfortunately failed by less than 50 votes, so now our children’s schools are in dire need of additional funding. Last month the San Carlos School Board voted to try it on the voters again and put what is now Measure B on the May 5th mail-in only ballot. This measure needs to pass in order to preserve the many important core programs at our schools like Music, PE and our libraries.  If this measure does not pass not only will our children suffer but so will our San Carlos real estate values!! We all know that the #1 reason so many families flock to San Carlos is because of the great schools!

To help the cause our Intero San Carlos Office is being extremely proactive and collectively picking up our phones to remind voters to vote in favor of Measure B. We are gathering on April 20th, from 6:30pm to 8:30pm, here in our office at 1250 San Carlos Ave. We look forward to speaking with some of you.

Thanks again for your help and support in helping us pass Measure B!

See Also